Back

Tracking Evolutionary Costs Of Immune Adaptation Against Single Versus Coinfecting Pathogens

Seal, S.; Tiwari, P.; Ghosh, K.; Debnath, P.; Kumari, N.; Khan, I.

2026-02-27 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.26.708363 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Immunity against pathogens is costly and can adversely affect fitness through resource allocation or physiological trade-offs. Infection by multiple pathogens may further worsen the effects if hosts require the activation of multiple immune responses, which in turn can elevate the overall immunological costs. Poor body condition and stressful environments can also exacerbate these trade-offs. In this study, we experimentally tested these possibilities using Tribolium castaneum populations that were evolving against either a single or a set of coinfecting bacterial pathogens. Contrary to our expectations, none of these evolved beetles showed any measurable trade-offs between pathogen resistance vs major fitness traits, such as reproduction or lifespan. Instead, they appeared to increase reproductive success and resistance to starvation, suggesting improved body condition that could mask underlying fitness costs. However, evolved beetles showed reduced quinone production, an externally secreted antimicrobial defence, indicating trade-offs between internal vs external immunity. Finally, we identified reproductive costs only under limited resource availability, but not under suboptimal resource quality, suggesting that trade-offs can be highly condition-dependent. Overall, this study provides a unique comparison across pathogens and infection types, highlighting the importance of analysing variation in life-history traits within relevant ecological contexts to understand fitness costs of evolving immunity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.1%
2
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.0%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.9%
5
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
6
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
7
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
8
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
9
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
12
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
13
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
14
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
15
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
17
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
24
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Developmental & Comparative Immunology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
26
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%