Back

Simulations reveal hybridization in Caribbean Acropora restoration poses low risk of genetic swamping but limited potential for adaptive introgression

LaPolice, T. M.; Howe, C. N.; Locatelli, N. S.; Huber, C. D.

2026-02-28 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.02.26.708281 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Severe global declines in coral populations have driven growing demand for human intervention and restoration. One goal of restoration is to repopulate reef ecosystems through outplanting, which requires detailed understanding of target systems. However, long term ecological and reproductive data from interventions remain scarce. An exception to this are the critically endangered Caribbean corals, Acropora palmata and A. cervicornis, which have been central to restoration efforts in the region. These species serve as a unique case study due to the abundance of published data spanning ecology, and reproductive biology. In the wild, these species can cross to form an F1 hybrid, A. prolifera, though it is rarely used in restoration. It remains unclear whether A. prolifera is an evolutionary dead-end competing with its parents, or a potential bridge enabling genetic exchange via backcrossing. To evaluate benefits and risks of restoration among Caribbean Acropora, we developed a two-dimensional agent-based simulation using reproductive and ecological data to model realistic reef dynamics. Our model suggests the hybrid can facilitate introgression between parentals without outcompeting them. Yet, such introgression is too limited for large-scale or beneficial ancestry transfer except under ecologically unrealistic conditions or timescales significantly longer than those relevant for management. Thus, our model suggests that the risks of genetic swamping may be overstated, whereas hopes for adaptive introgression are also low, underscoring the value of simulations for generating long-term ecological and evolutionary insights relevant to coral restoration.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.5%
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.5%
5
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
6
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
7
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.8%
10
Coral Reefs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
16
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
17
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
21
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
22
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
23
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
25
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%