Back

Limited predictability of tree-level responses to drought across European forests

Rodriguez Hernandez, D. I.; Fischer, F. J.; O'Brien, D.; De Kauwe, M.; Wang, B.; Bouriaud, O.; Jucker, T.

2026-02-28 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.26.708208 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Climate change is increasing the frequency, duration and severity of extreme events such as heatwaves and droughts, pushing trees near or beyond their ecophysiological limits. Understanding what governs variability in how trees respond to drought - such as intrinsic factors related to their size, age, and species, or extrinsic factors shaped by their local competitive environment - is critical for predicting long-term forest resilience to climate change and developing climate-smart forest management strategies. Here, we use tree ring data from 2909 trees belonging to sixteen species distributed across Europes major forest types to comprehensively assess what factors contribute most to a trees ability to withstand and recover from extreme drought events. We found that trees with larger living crowns generally exhibited higher post-drought growth recovery and resilience, while trees exposed to lower drought intensities showed greater resistance. Conversely, neither the density nor the diversity of a trees local competitive neighbourhood had any clear influence on its response to drought. More generally, we found that our ability to predict whether a tree would exhibit resilience to drought was low (R2 = 13-21) and was largely driven by species-specific responses and topographic variation across forest types, rather than by tree- and stand-level attributes. These findings highlight that drought responses are inherently complex and strongly influenced by forest type and by heterogeneous responses among species. Integrating tree-ring, physiological, and remote-sensing data with mechanistic models represents a promising avenue for improving forecasts of future forest resilience to climate change.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
4
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
5
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
6
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
9
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
13
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
15
Tree Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
21
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
23
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%