Back

Spatially Integrated Multi-Omics reveals the Multicellular Landscape of Progenitor-Driven Glioblastoma Progression

Traeuble, K.; Traeuble, J.; MOSAIC consortium, ; Kaminski Schierle, G. S.; Heinig, M.

2026-02-28 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.02.26.708154 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glioblastoma is the most lethal primary brain tumor, driven by complex interactions between plastic malignant cells and a diverse tumor microenvironment. Despite advances in single-cell profiling, how genomic drivers and the tumor microenvironment interact to determine tumor progression and patient survival remains poorly understood. While cellular states have been cataloged, the multi-cellular logic coordinating these into lethal phenotypes remains unresolved. Here, we integrate whole-exome sequencing, bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and histopathology from the MOSAIC cohort (n = 89) to deconstruct this inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity. We identify a robust latent multi-omic program in glioblastoma that delineates a transition from homeostatic neural precursors to an aggressive, immunosuppressive progenitor phenotype. This high-risk state, which predicts poor survival in both the MOSAIC discovery and independent validation cohorts (TCGA, CGGA; total n = 598), is sustained by dense intercellular communication networks linking malignant progenitors with myeloid and endothelial compartments. Spatially, this program maps to hypoxic, perinecrotic niches, directly linking molecular signaling with microvascular proliferation and tissue necrosis. Our findings provide a spatially resolved, multi-omic blueprint of the multicellular logic driving glioblastoma progression, offering a robust molecular framework for patient stratification and targeted intervention.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.