Back

CsFDL1-CsFTL3 complex represses CsFTL3 via negative feedback to fine-tune flowering in Chrysanthemum seticuspe

Wang, S.; Wang, C.; Mei, Z.; Yang, Y.; Zhong, S.; Qiu, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; Chen, S.; Fang, W.; Chen, F.; Jiang, J.

2026-02-28 plant biology
10.64898/2026.02.26.708152 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In many flowering plants, the transition from vegetative growth to reproductive development is regulated by seasonal changes in photoperiod. Under inductive photoperiods, leaves produce the florigen FT (FLOWERING LOCUS T), which is transported to the shoot apex to promote flowering. The photoperiod is known to have a major effect on the flowering of chrysanthemum. In the perennial short-day (SD) plant Chrysanthemum seticuspe, the expression of CsFTL3 (FT-like gene) does not increase immediately after shifting from long-day (LD) to SD conditions but gradually accumulates under continuous SD conditions, peaking during inflorescence development. However, the underlying mechanism remains elusive. We show that CsFDL1 (an ortholog of FD) and CsFTL3 exhibit a significant inverse expression pattern in leaves during the initial stage of short-day inductions. Furthermore, the expression of CsFTL3 is upregulated in the leaves of CsFDL1-knockdown transgenic lines. CsFDL1 is expressed in leaves and forms a complex with CsFTL3 to recognize several TCGA- and ACGT-containing motifs in the CsFTL3 promoter. The CsFTL3-CsFDL1 complex downregulates CsFTL3 expression, thereby preventing its excessive induction by SD signals and inhibiting precocious floral transition. This study reveals that CsFDL1 acts as a key early repressor in the photoperiodic flowering pathway of chrysanthemum leaf, mediating negative feedback regulation by forming a complex with CsFTL3 to achieve precise temporal control of short-day-dependent flowering responses.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.0%
2
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.1%
3
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
4
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
5
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.8%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
9
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
13
Plant and Cell Physiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
15
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
16
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.8%
19
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.3%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.2%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.2%
23
Plant And Cell Physiology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
25
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
28
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%