Back

Not all mantra meditations are equal: Emergence of divergent alpha oscillatory dynamics across mantras

Li, A.; Rodriguez Larios, J.; Zhang, M.; Liu, T.; Cohen, B. H.; Ravishankar, S.

2026-03-02 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.26.707862 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The study of contemplative practices has evolved into a mature field, yet current taxonomies tend to classify all mantra-based meditation approaches as a single category, overlooking potentially different neural states induced by different mantras or different instructions. To address this gap, we conducted a study of 50 novice subjects practicing two types of mantra-based meditation over a six week period to evaluate changes in Electroencephalography (EEG) during and after meditation. Participants were randomly assigned to meditating with the Hare Krishna (HK) and Sa-Ta-Na-Ma (SA) mantras. Using spectral parameterization, we assessed the effects of each type of meditation on individual alpha power (IAP), individual alpha frequency (IAF) and center of gravity (CoG). The results revealed marked differences in alpha dynamics between the two practices. On the one hand, the HK group exhibited widespread IAP decrease and an IAF/CoG increase during mantra meditation that was maintained during rest after the meditation, which became more pronounced after training in the HK meditation. On the other hand, the SA group showed a localized IAP reduction during meditation and significant reduction of IAF during meditation after training. We suggest that the higher cognitive demands of HK induce a more activating, attentionally focused state, whereas SA promotes a more relaxed state. Additional psychological data show that both meditation groups had reduction in stress. Thus, these findings challenge the monolithic classification of mantra meditation and highlight the importance of differentiating practices according to their mechanisms, particularly for their targeted application in mental health contexts.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
13.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.6%
3
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.8%
5
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
6
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
9
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
10
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
International Journal of Psychophysiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
12
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
13
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
14
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
15
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
19
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
26
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
29
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%