Back

Physics-Based Growth and Remodeling Modeling for Virtual Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Evolution and Growth Prediction

Jahani, F.; Jiang, Z.; Nabaei, M.; Baek, S.

2026-03-03 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.26.26347026 medRxiv
Show abstract

Computational growth and remodeling (G&R) models have been extentively used to investigate abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) progression and to support clinical decision-making. However, the development of robust predictive models is often limited by the scarcity of large-scale longitudinal imaging datasets. In this study, we propose a physics-based G&R framework to simulate AAA shape evolution and generate a virtual cohort of aneurysms, thereby addressing data limitations and enabling integration with data-driven machine learning approaches for growth prediction. The proposed arterial G&R model incorporates key mechanisms influencing aneurysm progression, including elastin degradation and stress-mediated collagen production. A modified elastin degradation formulation was introduced to generate realistic aneurysm geometries exhibiting clinically relevant features such as asymmetry and tortuosity. By systematically varying parameters governing elastin damage and collagen production, 200 distinct G&R simulations were performed to produce a diverse set of AAA geometries. The dataset was further expanded using kriging-based spatial interpolation to construct a large in silico cohort. The synthetic dataset, combined with longitudinal imaging data from 25 patients, was used to train and validate four machine learning models: Deep Belief Network (DBN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU). A two-step training strategy was adopted to predict maximum aneurysm diameter and growth rate based on prior geometric characteristics. The LSTM model achieved the highest performance for maximum diameter prediction (R{superscript 2} = 0.92), while the RNN demonstrated strong overall performance (R{superscript 2} = 0.90 for maximum diameter and 0.89 for growth rate). The DBN and GRU models also showed competitive predictive capability. Overall, this study demonstrates that integrating physics-based G&R simulations with machine learning enables accurate prediction of AAA growth and maximum diameter. The proposed framework provides a scalable strategy for augmenting limited clinical datasets and offers a promising tool to support personalized risk assessment and treatment planning.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
2
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.2%
5
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
8
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
9
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.3%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
13
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
17
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%