Back

Early treatment outcome prediction in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer utilizing 3-month tumor growth rate (g-rate) based machine learning model

Ugwueke, E. C.; Azzam, M.; Zhou, M.; Teply, B. A.; Bergan, R. C.; Wan, S.; Fojo, A. T.; Leuva, H.; Wang, J.

2026-03-03 oncology
10.64898/2026.02.26.26346987 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOnce the treatment starts, early prediction of treatment benefit and its correlation with overall survival (OS) remains challenging in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Existing prognostic models require long-term follow-up, limiting their ability to inform timely treatment decisions. To address this gap, we evaluated tumor growth rate (g-rate)-based survival models across multiple treatment lines to assess their ability to predict OS and support early clinical decision-making. MethodsWe developed GxSurv, a Random Survival Forest (RSF)-based framework that incorporates baseline clinical variables and g-rate calculated from serial on-treatment PSA, to construct line-specific prediction models of OS, a direct measure of treatment outcome. Three variants were developed: G3Surv, using the 3-month g-rate; G6Surv, using the 6-month g-rate; and GfSurv, using the final observed g-rate. Model performance was evaluated using Harrells C-index, Unos C-index, Integrated Brier Score (IBS), time-dependent area under the curve (tAUC). Model interpretability was assessed using permutation importance to quantify predictor contributions within the GxSurv framework. FindingsThe study included 15912 treatment records from 11014 patients with mCPRC across four lines of therapy. We found that incorporation of g-rate consistently improved model performance across all treatment lines, with all GxSurv models outperforming Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH). As the earliest prognostic model, our G3Surv demonstrated strong early predictive performance, with Harrells C-index values ranging from 0{middle dot}700 to 0{middle dot}746 and tAUC values of 0{middle dot}766 to 0{middle dot}822 across all lines, representing 5-8% and 4-5% improvements over CoxPH, respectively. These results indicate that G3Surv accurately predicts individual treatment outcomes at 3 months after treatment initiation. Feature importance analyses consistently identified g-rate as a top predictor, followed by baseline PSA and hemoglobin, with relative variation across treatment lines. InterpretationIntegrating g-rate calculated from on-treatment PSA values enables accurate, line-specific prediction of treatment outcomes in mCRPC, with the 3-month g-rate providing robust early prognostic information to support timely, personalized clinical decision-making. FundingU.S. National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, American Cancer Society.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.0%
2
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
3
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
8
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
12
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
18
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
27
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
29
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
30
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%