Back

Diagnostic Accuracy of an Immunoassay Using Avidity-Enhanced Polymeric Peptides for SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection

Pollo, B. A. L. V.; Ching, D.; Idolor, M. I.; King, R. A.; Climacosa, F. M.; Caoili, S. E.

2026-03-02 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.02.26.26343835 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThere is a need for synthetic peptide-based serologic assays that exploit avidity to replace whole antigens while enabling low-cost diagnostics in resource-limited settings. ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a polymeric peptide-based ELISA leveraging avidity to enhance signal. MethodA 15-member SARS-CoV-2 peptide library corresponding to multiple epitope clusters and proteins was screened by indirect ELISA using pooled sera from RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients to identify peptides with possible diagnostic utility. The identified lead candidate, S559, possessed terminal cysteine-substitution to allow disulfide polymerization, and the resulting avidity gain was evaluated by comparing the apparent dissociation constant (KDapp) before and after depolymerization with N-acetylcysteine. The performance of an optimized ELISA using S559 was evaluated on 1,222 prospectively collected COVID-19 serum samples and 218 biobanked pre-COVID control serum samples. ResultsPolymeric S559 with a KDapp of 29.26 nM-1was demonstrated to have a 218% avidity gain relative to the completely depolymerized form. At pre-defined thresholds, the optimized S559 ELISA has a sensitivity and specificity of 83.39% (95%CI: 81.18% and 85.43%) and 96.79% (95%CI: 93.50% and 98.70%), respectively. At post hoc thresholds determined by Youden index, sensitivity and specificity reached 95.01 (95% CI: 93.63% - 96.16%) and 100.00% (95% CI: 98.32% - 100.00%), respectively. ConclusionHomomultivalent epitope presentation using polymeric S559 allows a highly specific immunoassay using human sera that may have important value in detecting antibodies, whether for diagnosing infection, confirming vaccination status or conducting surveillance.

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
2
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
3
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
4
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
5
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.8%
7
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
10
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
12
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
13
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
14
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
16
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
20
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
21
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
22
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
30
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%