Back

MAP: A Knowledge-driven Framework for Predicting Single-cell Responses for Unprofiled Drugs

Feng, J.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, X.; Liu, M.; Chen, J.; Quan, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, W.

2026-02-27 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.02.25.708091 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Predicting how cells respond to chemical perturbations is one of the goals for building virtual cells, yet experimentally profiled compounds cover only a small fraction of this space. Existing models struggle to generalize to unprofiled compounds, as they typically treat drugs as isolated identifiers without encoding their mechanistic relationships. We present MAP, a framework that integrates structured biological knowledge into cellular perturbation modeling and supports zero-shot prediction for small molecules with scarce or absent perturbation profiles. Specifically: (i) we construct MAP-KG, a large-scale knowledge graph tailored for cellular perturbation modeling that unifies 14 public resources, spanning 187k drugs, 23k genes, and 694k mechanistic relationships; (ii) we propose a knowledge-driven pre-training strategy that aligns molecular structures, protein sequence features, and textual mechanistic descriptions into a unified embedding space via contrastive learning, producing mechanism-aware and transferable gene and compound embeddings. The resulting knowledge-informed gene and drug representations are then coupled with a pretrained single-cell foundation model to condition perturbation response prediction; (iii) we evaluate MAP under two zero-shot generalization regimes: unseen cell type-drug combinations and the stricter setting of unprofiled drugs, where it improves top-50 DEG Pearson delta correlation by up to +13.3% and +12.2%, respectively, over the strongest baselines across three benchmarks. We further perform pathway-level functional analysis via GSEA for in-silico screening, where MAP predicts coherent, mechanism-consistent programs on unprofiled candidate drugs, and prioritizes 4 of 5 approved anti-cancer drugs in A-549 (non-small cell lung cancer).

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.