Back

Systematics, diversification, and biogeography of Macromiidae (Odonata: Anisoptera)

Uche Dike, R.

2026-02-26 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.25.708066 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Macromiidae is a widely distributed lineage of libelluloid dragonflies with a largely allopatric genus-level distribution across the Holarctic, Afrotropical, Australasian, and Indo-Malayan regions. Previous studies involving this family have been complicated by morphological convergence and limited phylogenetic sampling. Here, we present the most densely sampled phylogenetic framework for Macromiidae to date, using Anchored Hybrid Enrichment data from 62 of the 125 described species. Our sampling represents all four genera and major geographic regions, including Libelluloid and Cordulegastrid outgroups. Maximum likelihood recovered three major lineages: Epophthalmia, Phyllomacromia, and Macromia sensu lato, with Epophthalmia strongly supported as sister to Phyllomacromia. Didymops was not recovered as monophyletic and was placed within Macromia, although deeper relationships within the Macromia complex showed some gene tree discordance. We additionally scored seven male genitalic characters and reconstructed their evolution across a dated phylogeny. We revealed that these traits varied heavily in phylogenetic signal, with some characters supporting the major clades and others showing high degree of homoplasy. Fossil-calibrated divergence time estimation placed the crown origin of Macromiidae in the late Oligocene (24 Ma), with other major intrafamilial divergences concentrated in the Miocene. Historical biogeographic reconstructions consistently supported Afrotropical origins for Phyllomacromia, Indo-Malayan centered ancestry for Epophthalmia, and a multi-region history for Macromia + Didymops spanning Indo-Malayan, Australasian, and Nearctic regions. Habitat reconstructions favored lentic ancestry for Macromiidae, and diversification rate variation was best explained by trait-independent models rather than lentic/lotic habitat association.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.8%
3
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
5
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
7
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.2%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.0%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.3%
14
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
17
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
18
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
20
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
22
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
25
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
26
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%