Back

Combinatorial optimization of protein systems in synthetic cells

van den Brink, M.; Claassens, N. J.; Danelon, C.

2026-02-25 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.02.25.707944 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In vitro reconstitution of protein systems - e.g., metabolic pathways, genetic circuits or biosensors - often requires optimization to enhance their activity. Combinatorial DNA libraries that simultaneously target multiple genes allow for a holistic optimization strategy by studying the interplay between the systems components, which may reveal DNA variants that would be hidden when testing each element in isolation. Here, we screen large populations of synthetic vesicles that express combinatorial DNA variants of a DNA self-replicator or a phospholipid synthesis pathway. We simultaneously vary the strengths of multiple RBSs or synonymously mutate the first codons of multiple genes to explore the effects of the protein translation rates directly on the functionality of the two core synthetic cell modules. We isolated high performers through DNA self-selection or functional screening by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Long-read sequencing of the fittest variants informed on the optimal RBS strengths and base substitutions in the first codons and indicated which genes were most impactful in regulating the functionality of the protein systems. Single-mutation data were used to predict the fitness of combinatorial variants, which was compared with the experimental fitness observed. The theoretical fitness of combinatorial variants was extremely predictive for the two-gene library of the DNA replicator but less for the larger pathway library. Altogether, our approach exemplifies how combinatorial testing can be expanded from single proteins to multiprotein systems, which can in the future be extended to the evolutionary engineering of even larger genetic and metabolic networks, and eventually an entire artificial cell. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=68 SRC="FIGDIR/small/707944v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (28K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ac1d47org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b62339org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c2a7ddorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9abedf_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
43.6%
2
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.1%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
5
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.9%
6
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
7
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
10
Metabolic Engineering
68 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
12
Nature Chemistry
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
13
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Angewandte Chemie
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
17
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
20
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
24
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%