Back

Effects of expectation, attention, and NMDA receptor blockade on feedforward and feedback processing

Noorman, S.; Fahrenfort, J. J.; Heilbron, M.; Sergent, C.; Zantvoord, J. B.; van Gaal, S.; Stein, T.

2026-02-25 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.25.707924 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Perception is increasingly viewed as an inferential process wherein sensory inputs are integrated with prior expectations. We employed time-resolved decoding on electroencephalography (EEG) data (n = 30 male participants) to investigate how expectations modulate sensory processing across varying levels of stimulus complexity, and tested the effect of attention and NMDA receptor blockade. We designed a visual stimulus containing features of different complexity whose processing relies on distinct neural mechanisms: local contrast, collinearity, and the Kanizsa illusion, involving primarily feedforward, lateral, and feedback processes, respectively. EEG decoding revealed that expectations modulated lateral and feedback processing (better decoding for unexpected stimuli) but not feedforward processing. These expectation effects were confined to attended (task-relevant) features and were not observed for task-irrelevant features. The NMDA receptor antagonist memantine selectively enhanced decoding of the Kanizsa illusion, implicating NMDA-mediated feedback mechanisms in perceptual inference, but it did not modulate the effects of expectation or attention. These findings highlight the differential impact of expectations across different stages of sensory processing and reveal a distinct role of NMDA receptor-mediated feedback mechanisms. Significance statementPerception integrates sensory inputs with prior expectations. Using EEG decoding, we examined how expectations shape sensory processing at different levels of complexity and tested the effects of attention and NMDA receptor blockade. Our visual stimuli were designed to capture EEG markers of feedforward, lateral, and feedback mechanisms. Expectations influenced lateral and feedback processing (better decoding for unexpected stimuli) but not feedforward processing, and these effects were selective to task-relevant stimulus features. Memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, selectively improved decoding of the Kanizsa illusion, implicating NMDA-mediated feedback in perceptual inference, but it did not shape expectation or attention effects.

Published in The Journal of Neuroscience (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.