Back

Heterogeneity, Longitudinal Decline, and Metabolic Risk in MRI-Based Quantification of 20 Individual Hip and Thigh Muscles

Whitcher, B.; Raza, H.; Basty, N.; Thanaj, M.; Bell-Bradford, C.; Niglas, M.; Bell, J. D.; Thomas, E. L.; Amiras, D.

2026-02-27 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.02.25.26347009 medRxiv
Show abstract

Quantifying muscle health at scale has been limited by the difficulty of segmenting individual muscles on MRI. We developed an automated 3D deep-learning framework that segments 20 bilateral hip and thigh muscles from Dixon MRI, enabling muscle level quantification of volume and relative fat fraction (rFF). Applied to 10,840 baseline and 2,766 longitudinal UK Biobank scans, this framework supports population-scale phenotyping across demographic, metabolic and treatment exposures. Segmentation accuracy was robust, and increased with muscle size. Men had greater muscle volumes, whereas women showed consistently higher rFF. Fat infiltration was highest in postural and pelvic-stabilising muscles and lowest in the quadriceps, revealing pronounced anatomical heterogeneity. Over two years, most muscles showed small but consistent volume declines, with losses more uniform in men and more heterogeneous in women; rFF increased more prominently in women, suggesting early compositional deterioration. In T2D, men showed widespread volume loss and elevated rFF, whereas women showed minimal volume loss and heterogeneous fat changes, revealing sex-specific disease signatures. Automated muscle-specific MRI phenotyping resolves structural and compositional changes obscured by compartment-level measures and provides a scalable platform for population-level studies of musculoskeletal ageing, metabolic disease, and therapeutic response.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
41.2%
2
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
3
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
5
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
7
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.7%
9
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
10
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
2.8%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
14
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
16
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
17
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
19
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
20
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
21
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
23
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%