Back

Antimicrobial resistance prevalence in clinical and aquatic environmental ESKAPE: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Vaz, A. B. M.; Murad, B.; Lopes, B. C.; Castro, M. L. P.; Fernandes, G. R.; Oliveira, W. K.; Fonseca, P. L. C.; Aguiar, E. R. G. R.; Mota Filho, C. R.; Santos, A. B.; Starling, C. E. F.

2026-02-28 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.25.26346099 medRxiv
Show abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in ESKAPE pathogens represents a major global health threat. Although these organisms are well established as causes of healthcare-associated infections, aquatic environments may function as reservoirs and transmission pathways for resistance. This systematic review aimed to estimate the prevalence of AMR in ESKAPE pathogens isolated from water and wastewater and to compare resistance patterns with those observed in human clinical isolates. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251020930). PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched to January 14, 2025. Eligible studies were original research reporting antimicrobial susceptibility data for ESKAPE pathogens isolated from both aquatic environmental matrices and clinical samples. Pooled resistance prevalence was estimated using generalized linear mixed models, with heterogeneity assessed using {tau}{superscript 2} and I{superscript 2} statistics and small-study effects evaluated by funnel plots and Eggers test. Of 304 records identified, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled overall resistance prevalence was 0.46 (95% CI: 0.36-0.57), with heterogeneity (I{superscript 2} = 98.8%). Resistance was higher in clinical isolates (0.67; 95% CI: 0.55-0.77) than in environmental isolates (0.24; 95% CI: 0.14-0.39), and environmental resistance was greater in effluent-impacted waters than in non-effluent sources. Interpretation is limited by methodological heterogeneity, selective isolation approaches in environmental studies, and imprecision due to small and unevenly distributed samples. Overall, AMR in ESKAPE pathogens remains more prevalent in clinical settings, but aquatic environments, particularly wastewater, represent resistance reservoirs, underscoring the need for standardized methodologies within a One Health framework. Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251020930, CRD420251020930 HighlightsAntimicrobial resistance was higher in clinical isolates than in aquatic isolates. Resistance patterns showed extreme heterogeneity across studies. Effluent-impacted waters showed higher resistance than non-effluent sources. Higher environmental resistance in some classes reflected methodological artifacts.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
12.2%
3
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.9%
4
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
6
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
9
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
10
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
11
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
18
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
21
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
22
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
28
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
29
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.6%