Back

Experimental verification of the error minimization theory using non-standard genetic codes constructed in vitro

Miyachi, R.; Ichihashi, N.

2026-02-26 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.02.24.707864 bioRxiv
Show abstract

All living systems use an almost identical genetic code, the standard genetic code, in which 20 amino acids are assigned to 61 codons non-randomly. According to the error minimization theory, amino acids are arranged to minimize the mutational effect on protein function, while experimental verification remains limited. In this study, we constructed 10 non-standard genetic codes in vitro by reassigning three amino acids (Ala, Ser, and Leu) in vacant codons of the minimal genetic code, which consists of 21 tRNAs. Most of these non-standard genetic codes have a higher cost of amino acid replacement than the standard genetic code, calculated based on three amino acid properties: polar requirement (PR), molecular volume (MV), and hydropathy index (HI). The protein function of three reporter genes expressed using these non-standard genetic codes decreased similarly when random mutations were introduced into the genes, implying that the effect of mutations was similar across all the non-standard genetic codes tested here. This result provides direct experimental evidence that mutational robustness does not significantly change when the genetic code is altered within the range of mutational cost tested in this study (CostPR: 5.29 - 5.77, CostMV: 1848 - 2348, and CostHI: 3.27 - 5.10), which covers approximately 18.4% (PR), 37.6% (MV), and 50.8% (HI) of possible cost range achievable among one million randomly-generated genetic codes.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
13.0%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
4
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
5
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
6
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.3%
8
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
10
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
12
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
14
Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
22
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
26
DNA Research
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
30
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%