Back

High Resolution Multi-Pass Astral Analyzer Quantification Enables Highly Multiplexed 35-Plex Tandem Mass Tag Proteomics

Stewart, H.; Shuken, S. R.; Rathje, C.; Kraegenbring, J.; Zeller, M.; Arrey, T. N.; Hagedorn, B.; Denisov, E.; Ostermann, R.; Grinfeld, D.; Petzoldt, J.; Mourad, D.; Cochems, P.; Bonn, F.; Delanghe, B.; Wiedemeyer, M.; Wagner, A.; Bomgarden, R.; Frost, D. C.; Zuniga, N. R.; Rad, R.; Paulo, J. A.; Damoc, E.; Makarov, A.; Zabrouskov, V.; Hock, C.; Gygi, S. P.

2026-02-26 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.02.24.707764 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tandem mass tags (TMT) allow highly multiplexed and thus high-throughput, precisely quantitative proteomic analysis. Incorporation of additional deuterated reporter channels has near-doubled the multiplexation achieved with Thermo Scientific TMTpro reagents from 18 to 35-plex but requires extremely high [~]100k analyzer resolving power at m/z 128 to differentiate and quantify reporter ion channels, far beyond any single reflection time-of-flight analyzer, and exceeding the multi-reflection Thermo Scientific Astral analyzer in its standard operation. A multi-pass mode of Astral operation has been developed for the Thermo Scientific Orbitrap Astral Zoom mass spectrometer that triples the ion path to 90 m, more than doubling resolving power for a narrow m/z range. This "TMT HR mode" has been integrated into a new method of TMT proteomic analysis that splits regular MS2 analysis of labeled peptides into paired measurements comprising wide mass range scans for peptide identification, and TMT HR mode scans for reporter ion quantification. The method has been shown to accurately quantify 32-plex labeled HeLa protein lysate and provide far greater depth of analysis as state-of-the-art Orbitrap-only methods, while analysis of 11-plex labeled yeast showed no analytical depth sacrificed vs regular Orbitrap Astral TMT analysis. Further comparative measurements of a 2-cell line 35-plex sample demonstrated greater analytical depth, and similar quantitative precision, to "gold standard" Orbitrap MS3 methods.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.1%
2
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.3%
4
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
6
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
8
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
Clinical Proteomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
13
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
15
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
16
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.8%
18
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
22
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
25
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%