Back

Circadian immunometabolic states impart a temporal response to SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins in mammalian macrophages

Buel, S. M.; Balaraman, J.; Jankowski, M. S.; Hixson, K. K.; Gao, Y.; Kim, Y.-m.; Munoz, N.; Kyle, J. E.; Lipton, M. S.; Nicora, C. D.; Piehowski, P. D.; Baker, S. E.; Hurley, J. M.

2026-02-25 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.02.24.707668 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Circadian rhythms, driven by 24-hour molecular oscillators, or "clocks", widely tune physiology to the daily rhythms of light and dark to enhance organismal fitness. In mammals, the cellular immune response is tightly regulated by these rhythms such that immunometabolic output is coordinated across the day, consolidating macrophage physiology into temporally distinct phases that determine the macrophage response to stimuli. Importantly, key proteins in the macrophage response to viral infection have been found to be under circadian control, and time of day of adjuvant application is known to affect the efficacy of vaccinations, including in the case of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, little is known about the molecular changes that underly the temporal response to vaccine application. Therefore, to investigate the circadian response of macrophage physiology to adjuvant exposure, we exposed primary mouse and human macrophages to the SARS-CoV-1 and CoV-2 spike proteins at different times over the circadian day. To further explore the time-of-day effect, we performed a multi-omics analysis and in vitro tissue culture assays examining macrophage responses over circadian time. We found that, conserved across the species, the timing of spike protein exposure dictated two distinct temporal responses which were characterized by hallmarks of immunometabolic suppression and modest immunometabolic activation. Intriguingly, these temporal responses were driven by central metabolic and mitochondrial changes rather than classical immune activation, suggesting immunometabolic control is a primary regulator of the temporal response of immune cells to stimuli.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.4%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.0%
3
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.3%
4
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.3%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 18%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.8%
8
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
9
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
10
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.6%
11
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.3%
12
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
13
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
20
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
22
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.6%