Back

Aphid presence and abundance, more than variation in leaf terpenoid profiles at the plant and plot-level, drive ant behaviour on the perennial forb Tanacetum vulgare

Setordjie, E. A.; Ojeda-Prieto, L.; Weisser, W.; Heinen, R.

2026-02-25 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.24.707654 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1) Differences in specialized metabolites are common both within and between plant species and are often thought to have regulating functions in ecological interactions, including herbivores like aphids. Although ants commonly rely on chemical cues in their behaviour and resource finding, very little is known about whether specialized plant chemistry regulates ant behaviour to foster successful ant-aphid mutualisms on plants and in the surrounding vegetation. 2) Using a chemodiversity experiment containing 84 plots with 6 chemotypes of Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare L. Asteraceae) planted in different proportions, i.e., plot-level chemotype richness, we tested the effects of plot-level chemotype richness, plot-level chemodiversity metrics, and individual chemotype presence on black garden ant (Lasius niger Linnaeus) nesting, patrolling and recruitment behaviour to plants and plots. Furthermore, we assessed the influence of plant chemotype on the pink tansy aphid (Metopeurum fuscoviride H.L.G. Stroyan) presence and abundance, as well as ant occurrence on Tansy plants. 3) We found that Tansy plot-level chemodiversity only minimally affected most of the observed ant behaviour, except for nesting, which was marginally positively impacted by plot-level chemotype richness. Clear effects of individual terpenoid chemotypes were observed on ant visitation rates, as well as on aphid presence and abundance. Strongly significant relationships between the probability of ant occurrence and aphid abundance and occurrence observed in our study suggest that ants and aphids are most strongly guided by the presence and abundance of their mutualist partners, rather than by specialized chemistry alone in the Tansy system.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.5%
3
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
5
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
8
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
9
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
10
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
19
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
20
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
21
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
25
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
30
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%