Back

Exploring the Influence of Chemical Exposures in Breast Cancer Disparities: High-Throughput Transcriptomic Analysis in Normal Breast Cells from Diverse Donors

Zhao, N.; Zhao, P.; Tapaswi, A.; Polemi, K. M.; Thong, T.; Sexton, J. Z.; Charles, S.; Wicha, M. S.; Svoboda, L.; Zhou, X.; Colacino, J.

2026-02-24 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.02.23.707203 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Racial disparities in the incidence of, and mortality from, aggressive breast cancers are a pressing public health issue. Many factors have been investigated in these inequities; however, the role of toxicant exposures is not well characterized. We and others have identified substantial inequities in chemical biomarker concentrations by race. The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that exposure to these chemicals is linked to biological changes relevant to aggressive breast cancers, such as dysregulation of the Hallmarks of Cancer. We used high throughput transcriptomic profiling of normal primary human breast epithelial cells from diverse donors (n=6) to test effects of 8 chemicals (cadmium, lead, arsenic, copper, PFNA, BPA, BPS, p,p-DDE) with documented exposure disparities by race/ethnicity across 3 concentrations (100nM, 1{micro}M, 10{micro}M). Across chemicals, we identified that pathways related to cell cycle regulation and protein secretion were commonly affected. Through bioinformatic estimation of cell type proportions, we found that metals like lead and cadmium induced cell-type shifts, consistent with the dysregulated cellular plasticity cancer hallmark. Lead and arsenic response genes were enriched for genes associated with poor breast cancer survival in the Cancer Genome Atlas. Integrating concentration-response modeling and chemical biomonitoring data, BPA, p,p-DDE, copper, and lead elicited expression changes at concentrations relevant to the US population. Finally, we identified substantial interindividual heterogeneity in response to organic compounds, but less so in metals. These findings highlight the value of high-throughput transcriptomics as a New Approach Methodology (NAM) in quantifying how common exposures may impact aggressive breast cancer associated biological processes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.2%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
7
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
8
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
9
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
10
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
11
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
12
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
13
NeuroToxicology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
15
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
17
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
18
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
22
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
23
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%