Onco-Shikshak: An AI-Native Adaptive Learning Ecosystem for Medical Oncology Education
Makani, A.
Show abstract
Medical oncology education faces a dual crisis: knowledge velocity that outpaces static curricula and large language model (LLM) risks--hallucination and automation bias--that threaten the fidelity of AI-assisted learning. We present Onco-Shikshak V7, an AI-native adaptive learning platform that addresses both challenges through a unified cognitive architecture grounded in learning science. The system replaces isolated educational modules with four authentic clinical workflows--Morning Report, Tumor Board, Clinic Day, and AI Textbook--each scaffolded by a nine-module pedagogy engine that integrates ACT-R activation dynamics (illness scripts), Item Response Theory (adaptive difficulty), the Free Spaced Repetition Scheduler (FSRS v4), Zone of Proximal Development (scaffolding), and metacognitive calibration training (Brier score). Six specialist AI agents--medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, pathology, radiology, and oncology navigation--engage in multi-disciplinary deliberation with per-specialty retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounding across nine authoritative guideline sources including NCCN, ESMO, and ASTRO. The platform provides 18 clinical cases with decision trees across six cancer types, maps every interaction to 13 ACGME Hematology-Oncology milestones, and implements four closed-loop feedback mechanisms that connect session errors to targeted flashcards, weak domains to suggested cases, and all interactions to a persistent learner profile. Technical validation confirms algorithmic correctness across eight subsystems. To our knowledge, this is the first system to unify ACT-R, IRT, FSRS, ZPD, and metacognitive calibration in a single medical education platform. Formal learner evaluation via randomized controlled trial is planned.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Framework to Assess Clinical Safety and Hallucination Rates of LLMs for Medical Text Summarisation 93%
- From Tool to Teammate: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Clinician-AI Collaborative Workflows for Diagnosis 93%
- Evaluating large language model workflows in clinical decision support: referral, triage, and diagnosis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models 92%
- Diagnostic Codes in AI prediction models and Label Leakage of Same-admission Clinical Outcomes 89%
- Prospective and External Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict In-Hospital Mortality 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.