Leveraging genome-wide effects on gene expression to identify disease-critical genes with trans-genetic components
Brunton, K.; Ragsac, M. F.; Amariuta, T.
Show abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have implicated tens of thousands of genetic variants associated with complex traits and polygenic diseases. Colocalizing GWAS variants with variants that may regulate gene expression, via expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) mapping, has successfully led to the identification of disease-critical genes and their cell types of action. Recent studies predominantly colocalize proximal cis-eQTLs, which are estimated to regulate [~]10% of variance in gene expression levels. However, trans-eQTLs have been hypothesized to account for an additional [~]20% of expression levels, although few studies have attempted to quantify the variance explained by empirically associated trans-eQTLs. Here, we introduce EGRET (Estimating Genome-wide Regulatory Effects on the Transcriptome), an ensemble framework that jointly models cis-eQTLs with three distinct trans-eQTL mapping approaches: standard pairwise association testing via Matrix eQTL, and two functionally-informed methods, trans-PCO and GBAT. In real data, EGRET produced 353,408 predictive gene expression models (cross-validation R2 > 0, p < 0.01) across 49 GTEx tissues, including 12,317 gene-tissue pairs with a significantly nonzero trans-heritable component. For this set of genes, EGRET models explain 33% more gene expression variance than cis-eQTL models (EGRET average R2 = 0.104, FUSION average R2 = 0.078). We found that putative trans-regulating variants of EGRET models are enriched for regulatory elements such as enhancers, histone marks, and cis-eQTLs of other genes. We then hypothesized that EGRET models could nominate new disease-critical genes via a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) framework that models genome-wide regulatory effects on gene expression. In simulations of theoretically representative gene expression architectures ([~]30% heritability, where more than 70% is distal), EGRET increased the power to detect disease-critical genes by 1.2x-3.1x compared to cis-eQTL models. In real data analysis, we identified disease-associated genes via TWAS across GWAS summary statistics for 78 complex traits and polygenic diseases using gene expression prediction models from EGRET, cis-eQTL FUSION, and two state-of-the-art trans-eQTL TWAS methods, MOSTWAS and BGW-TWAS. EGRET identified 450,825 gene-disease associations that were not identified by FUSION models, 2,900 associations not identified by MOSTWAS, and 5,498 associations not identified by BGW-TWAS. Finally, we used EGRET models to construct gene regulatory networks, some of which harbored genes that were jointly associated with complex traits. For example, the gene members of the network defined by ARHGEF3, whose cis-regulatory variants help predict expression of 10 genes in trans, were concordantly associated with platelet count using EGRET but not FUSION models. Overall, we find that modeling the genome-wide genetic component of gene expression greatly boosts the detection of disease-critical genes and helps define gene regulatory networks while improving the characterization of GWAS variants.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The molecular basis, genetic control and pleiotropic effects of local gene co-expression 98%
- Uncovering causal gene-tissue pairs and variants: A multivariable TWAS method controlling for infinitesimal effects 98%
- Haplotype-aware modeling of cis-regulatory effects highlights the gaps remaining in eQTL data 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trans-eQTL mapping in gene sets identifies network effects of genetic variants 98%
- SNP-to-gene linking strategies reveal contributions of enhancer-related and candidate master-regulator genes to autoimmune disease 98%
- Variant-resolved prediction of context-specific isoform variation with a graph-based attention model 98%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.