Deletion size and background genetic variation shape congenital heart disease phenotypes in 3,016 individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
Angkustsiri, K.; Armando, M.; Bassett, A. S.; Bearden, C. E.; Breckpot, J.; Busa, T.; Campbell, L.; Carmel, M.; Crowley, T. B.; Devriendt, K.; Digilio, M. C.; Eliez, S.; Emanuel, B. S.; Fernandez, L.; Garcia-Minaur, S.; Goldmuntz, E.; Gothelf, D.; Gur, R. E.; Hawula, W.; Hajianpour, A.; Heine-Suner, D.; Kates, W. R.; Lin, J.-R.; Marino, B.; McDonald-McGinn, D. M.; Michaelovsky, E.; Miller, D.; Morrow, B. E.; Murphy, K. C.; Murphy, D.; Nelson, T.; Owen, M. J.; Pontillo, M.; Repetto, G. M.; Scherer, S. W.; Schneider, M.; Schoch, K.; Shashi, V.; Shprintzen, R. J.; Swillen, A.; Thiruvahindrapuram,
Show abstract
Congenital heart disease (CHD) occurs in over half of individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) and the types of lesions range from mild to severe. To determine the basis of variation in cardiac phenotypes we analyzed demographic data from 3,016 unrelated individuals with 22q11.2DS from centers in the Northeast US, Canada, Europe, South America, Israel and Australia. Most individuals in this cohort had a 3 million base pair hemizygous deletion between low copy repeat, LCR22 A-D (87.2%), while some had nested deletions. We performed multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression and uncovered significant differences between CHD phenotypes and basic demographic features. Individuals with the A-D deletion had a lower risk of persistent truncus arteriosus (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.18-0.75) but a higher risk of septal defects (OR = 4.7, 95% CI 1.7-12.8) compared to those with the smaller A-B deletion, suggesting distinct developmental pathways sensitive to 22q11.2 gene dosage. In addition, genome-wide genetic principal components (PCs) were associated with specific CHD subtypes, including reduced risk of pulmonary stenosis or atresia with other heart lesions (PC2; OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.87) and increased risk of abnormal origin of the subclavian arteries (PC4; OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.4-4.9), indicating that background genetic variation modifies heart lesion-specific susceptibility. Together, these results suggest that both deletion size and background genetic variation shape the highly variable cardiac phenotypes in 22q11.2DS.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical genetic risk variants inform a functional protein interaction network for tetralogy of Fallot 95%
- Multi-ethnic genome-wide association study of decomposed cardioelectric phenotypes illustrates strategies to identify and characterize evidence of shared genetic effects for complex traits 94%
- A genotype-phenotype taxonomy of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Joint Association of Polygenic Risk and Social Determinants of Health with Coronary Heart Disease in the United States 93%
- ClinGen Hereditary Cardiovascular Disease Gene Curation Expert Panel: Reappraisal of Genes associated with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 93%
- Prevalence and clinical importance of titin truncating variants in adults without known congestive heart failure 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A validated heart-specific model for splice-disrupting variants in childhood heart disease 95%
- Beyond gene-disease validity: capturing structured data on inheritance, allelic-requirement, disease-relevant variant classes, and disease mechanism for inherited cardiac conditions 94%
- The impact of damaging epilepsy and cardiac genetic variant burden in sudden death in the young 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rare Genomic Copy Number Variants Implicate New Candidate Genes for Bicuspid Aortic Valve 95%
- Genetic loci associated with prevalent and incident myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease in the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium 93%
- GWAS of QRS Duration Identifies New Loci Specific to Hispanic/Latino Populations 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.