Back

Predictors of statin intolerance in primary care using real-world data

Rakhshanda, S.; Jonnagaddala, J.; Liaw, S.-T.; Rhee, J.; Rye, K.-A.

2026-02-24 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.23.26346866 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to explore the predictors of statin intolerance in the primary and secondary prevention of CVD among patients in the first two years after the date of first prescription using real-world data. MethodsThis study used the Electronic Practice Based Research Network Linked Dataset. An algorithm, which considered the muscle symptoms and creatinine kinase of patients, was used to identify statin intolerant patients. The R software was used for all analyses. Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed along with sensitivity analysis which was done using the Akaike Information Criterion model selection method. ResultsOverall, 4,016 patients accounting for 60,873 visits met the selection criteria. About 3.5% of the patients were statin intolerant. After adjusting for all other variables, statin intolerance was positively associated with gender (AOR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0 - 2.2), SEIFA index (AOR 3.8, 95% CI 2.3 - 6.7), employment status (AOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1 - 5.7), and comorbidities (AOR 7.0, 95% CI 2.2 - 19.0). A similar direction of associations was seen for the exposures of the model from the sensitivity analysis and the regression model. However, since the unrecorded employment status showed a positive association, the sensitivity analysis suggests that the relationship may be influenced by residual confounding or information bias, indicating that this finding should be interpreted with caution. ConclusionStatin intolerance within the diverse community represented in the dataset is driven by gender, employment status, area-based social advantage and disadvantage index, and comorbidities.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.1%
2
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.3%
7
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
8
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
9
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
13
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
17
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
19
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
20
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
21
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
29
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%