Back

Associations of tattooing with health: a population-based cross-sectional study of ~27,000 US adults

McCarty, R. D.; Trabert, B.; Millar, M. M.; Kriebel, D.; Grieshober, L.; Barnard, M. E.; Collin, L. J.; Gilreath, J. A.; Shami, P. J.; Doherty, J. A.

2026-02-24 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.02.23.26346861 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo characterize associations between tattooing and health status. MethodsWe used data from [~]27,000 respondents to the 2020-2022 Utah Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Multivariable Poisson regression was used to calculate prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) associating ever receiving a tattoo with physical/mental health status. ResultsIn this cross-sectional study, ever receiving a tattoo was associated with self-reported "poorer" vs. "excellent" overall health, particularly among women (PR=3.08 [95% CI: 2.26- 4.21]). Tattooing was also associated with obesity (women, PR=1.40 [95% CI: 1.22-1.61]; men, PR=1.21 [95% CI: 1.04-1.40]) and chronic pain (women, PR=1.59 [95% CI: 1.43-1.77]; men, PR=1.55 [95% CI: 1.37-1.76]). Tattooed individuals were more likely to have been diagnosed with a depressive disorder (women, PR=1.64 [95% CI: 1.53-1.75]; men, PR=1.55 [95% CI: 1.39-1.73]) and to have had six or more teeth removed, vs. none (women, PR=2.18 [95% CI: 1.61-2.96]; men, PR=2.88 [95% CI: 2.10-3.95]). ConclusionsPublic health entities may consider partnering with tattoo studios and conventions to provide information about nutrition, exercise, dental care, mental health resources, and health screenings.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.