Back

Alcov2: a National Questionnaire Survey for Understanding the Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in French Households during First Lockdown

Lambert, A.; Bonnet, A.; Clavier, P.; Biousse, P.; Clavieres, L.; Brouillet, S.; Chachay, S.; Jauffret-Roustide, M.; Lewycka, S.; Chesneau, N.; Nuel, G.

2026-02-24 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.02.23.26344954 medRxiv
Show abstract

We describe a fast, noninvasive, low-cost survey method designed to understand the mode of transmission of an emerging pathogen. It is inspired from the standard household prevalence survey consisting in sampling households and counting the total number of people infected in each household, but refines it with the aim of improving diagnosis and estimating more parameters of the model of intra-household transmission. The survey was carried out in May-June 2020, during part of the first national French lockdown and received responses from more than 6,000 households involving a total of 20,000 people. We explain how we conceived the questionnaire, how we disseminated it, to the public through an open website hosted by CNRS, marketed through media and social media, and to a socially representative panel hosted by two survey institutes (BVA, Bilendi). We used the data obtained from the representative panel to correct for sampling biases in the CNRS survey using a classical raking procedure. Our results indicate that raking correctly canceled statistical biases between the two populations. We obtain the empirical distribution in households of the number and nature of symptoms. The main factors affecting the presence of symptoms are age, gender, body mass index (BMI), household size, but not necessarily in the expected direction. Our study shows that combining self-reporting and representative surveys allows investigators to obtain information on prevalence and household transmission mechanisms on emerging diseases at low cost.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.7%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.1%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 31%
6.1%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.7%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
8
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
9
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.5%
10
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
11
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
12
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
13
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
14
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.1%
19
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.8%
24
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
28
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%