Back

Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) selected for high social motivation rely on conspecifics for buffering but not learning in sociocognitive tasks

SERESSIA, J.; Morel, A.; Cornilleau, F.; Lemarchand, J.; Lansade, L.; Nawroth, C.; Calandreau, L.; Ferreira, V. H. B.

2026-02-23 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.02.22.707340 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Social living is widely considered a key driver of cognitive evolution, yet individuals within a species and even within the same group can differ substantially in their sociability (i.e., an individuals propensity to form and maintain social bonds), which can ultimately shape the social environment they experience by influencing how they interact with, respond to, and engage in it. How such individual variation in this personality trait affects social cognition, however, remains poorly understood. To address this question, we used two selectively bred lines of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) that consistently differ in social motivation, a key component of sociability, which we used as a proxy for this broader trait. In these lines, S+ individuals show high social motivation, whereas S- individuals show low social motivation. We compared their sociocognitive performance across three tasks: a gaze following task, a social buffering task, and a social discrimination learning task. Our findings revealed that Japanese quail reliably followed the gaze of conspecifics, providing the first evidence of this ability in this species. However, there was no difference between lines, suggesting that basic gaze following into the distance is independent of social motivation. In contrast, line differences emerged in the other tasks. S+ quail were more sensitive and less adaptable in response to environmental changes, particularly under social isolation, although the presence of a conspecific strongly buffered these effects. S- quail, on the other hand, outperformed S+ individuals in the social discrimination learning task, rapidly exploiting available social cues to guide foraging decisions. Overall, this study demonstrates that social motivation modulates sociocognitive performance in a context-dependent manner. Rather than conferring a general cognitive advantage, divergent selection on social motivation leads to different strategies of social information use across tasks and contexts, highlighting the complex interplay between personality, social environment, and cognition.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.8%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.9%
3
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
8
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
9
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
10
Hormones and Behavior
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.6%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
15
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
27
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%
29
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
General and Comparative Endocrinology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%