Back

Efficient derivation and transcriptional characterization of mouse extra-embryonic endoderm stem cell lines generated by somatic cell nuclear transfer

Li, S.; Wei, S.; Li, G.; Hu, M.; Lin, J.; Bao, W.

2026-02-23 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.02.22.707260 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) holds great promise for regenerative medicine and agriculture, but its application is severely hampered by low efficiency, primarily attributable to aberrant epigenetic reprogramming. Although embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and trophoblast stem cells (TSCs) have been successfully derived from cloned embryos, an in vitro counterpart of the primitive endoderm (PrE) lineage has remained unavailable. To address this gap, this study reports the first successful establishment of extra-embryonic endoderm stem cell lines (XENs) from mouse SCNT-derived blastocysts (NT-XENs). Under conventional culture conditions, NT-XENs were generated from hybrid B6D2F1 blastocysts at a high efficiency of 55%, comparable to that of fertilization-derived XEN lines (FD-XENs, 50%), whereas derivation from inbred C57BL/6J SCNT-derived blastocysts was markedly lower (12.5%). Immunofluorescence and NanoString multiplex gene expression profiling confirmed that NT-XENs robustly expressed specific marker genes for PrE/XENs (e.g., Gata4, Gata6, Sox17), while exhibiting negligible or absent expression of pluripotency and trophoblast markers. Based on NanoString assay data, NT-XENs and FD-XENs shared highly similar global gene expression patterns, yet also exhibited some nonnegligible differences, exemplified by the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) Pecam1, Gtl2, Thbd and Xlr3b, which may suggest that the NT-XENs resided in a more differentiated state (potentially biased toward parietal endoderm (PE)) and retained SCNT-specific epigenetic imprinting errors, including aberrant X-chromosome inactivation and dysregulation of imprinted domains. In summary, this study successfully establishes NT-XEN cell lines, providing a valuable in vitro model for investigating the reprogramming scenarios of PrE lineage in SCNT and offering novel insights into the mechanisms underlying developmental failure of cloned embryos.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
4
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Cell Proliferation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
13
Cell Research
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
16
Cell & Bioscience
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Development, Growth & Differentiation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
19
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
21
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Cell Death Discovery
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.5%
28
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
30
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%