Symptom network signatures for the early recognition of pancreatic cancer
Latigay, J.; Dy, L.; Solano, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundPancreatic cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality, and early recognition is challenging. To achieve early diagnosis using symptoms alone, we examined patterns across different stages using network analysis to derive clinically useful insights. MethodsSymptom variables from a de-identified dataset of 50,000 pancreatic cancer patients were analyzed. Stratification by stage was done, followed by bootstrap resampling to address imbalances across strata. Symptom networks were then constructed with nodes representing symptoms and edges representing conditional dependencies estimated via an Ising-style neighborhood selection approach implemented through L1-regularized logistic regression. Strength, betweenness, and closeness centrality indices were then calculated, and their stability was analyzed using the case-dropping bootstrap. Network comparison tests were done, and difference networks were analyzed. Spring-layout algorithm was used for visualization, with node size being the predictability (pseudo-R{superscript 2}), and the edge weight being the mean partial correlation magnitude. ResultsOn average, symptoms were present in about one out of four patients (M = 0.26). Weight loss and abdominal discomfort were the most prevalent of the symptoms, followed by jaundice and back pain. Network structures became sparser across stages with a decreasing number of edges and centrality indices. Jaundice emerged as the dominant hub in Stage I, but shared dominance with Weight Loss in Stage II. Node predictability (pseudo-R2) was effectively zero across all disease stages. ConclusionOur network analysis of pancreatic cancer symptomatology across stages revealed distinct patterns that may improve understanding of its clinical presentation and support earlier recognition.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the kidney disease progression using a comprehensive patient profiling algorithm: A hybrid clustering approach 92%
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 91%
- Molecular signatures for inflammation vary across cancer types and correlate significantly with tumor stage, gender and vital status of patients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A comprehensive algorithmic dissection yields biomarker discovery and insights into the discrete stage-wise progression of colorectal cancer 91%
- EsoDetect: Computational Validation and Algorithm Development of a Novel Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool for Dysplasia in Barrett’s Esophagus 91%
- Prognostic Analysis of Histopathological Images Using Pre-Trained Convolutional Neural Networks 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial tumour gene signature discriminates neoplastic from non-neoplastic compartments in colon cancer: unravelling predictive biomarkers for relapse 90%
- Panomics reveals patient-individuality as the major driver for colorectal cancer progression 89%
- Gut microbiome dysbiosis and immune activation correlate with somatic and neuropsychiatric symptoms in COVID-19 patients 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient stratification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using the global transcription factor activity landscape derived from RNA-seq data 91%
- Systems biomedicine of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer reveals potential therapeutic targets 91%
- Pan-cancer molecular signatures connecting aspartate transaminase (AST) to cancer prognosis, metabolic and immune signatures 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.