Back

Symptom network signatures for the early recognition of pancreatic cancer

Latigay, J.; Dy, L.; Solano, G.

2026-02-24 oncology
10.64898/2026.02.22.26346814 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPancreatic cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality, and early recognition is challenging. To achieve early diagnosis using symptoms alone, we examined patterns across different stages using network analysis to derive clinically useful insights. MethodsSymptom variables from a de-identified dataset of 50,000 pancreatic cancer patients were analyzed. Stratification by stage was done, followed by bootstrap resampling to address imbalances across strata. Symptom networks were then constructed with nodes representing symptoms and edges representing conditional dependencies estimated via an Ising-style neighborhood selection approach implemented through L1-regularized logistic regression. Strength, betweenness, and closeness centrality indices were then calculated, and their stability was analyzed using the case-dropping bootstrap. Network comparison tests were done, and difference networks were analyzed. Spring-layout algorithm was used for visualization, with node size being the predictability (pseudo-R{superscript 2}), and the edge weight being the mean partial correlation magnitude. ResultsOn average, symptoms were present in about one out of four patients (M = 0.26). Weight loss and abdominal discomfort were the most prevalent of the symptoms, followed by jaundice and back pain. Network structures became sparser across stages with a decreasing number of edges and centrality indices. Jaundice emerged as the dominant hub in Stage I, but shared dominance with Weight Loss in Stage II. Node predictability (pseudo-R2) was effectively zero across all disease stages. ConclusionOur network analysis of pancreatic cancer symptomatology across stages revealed distinct patterns that may improve understanding of its clinical presentation and support earlier recognition.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.2%
5
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
9
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.6%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
12
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
14
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
15
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
17
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
30
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%