Back

Resolving sialylated N Glycans and immune cell landscapes using a unified same-section IMC-MSI workflow

Griner, J. T.; Gerber, R.; Robinson, M. D.; Krieg, C.; Guglietta, S.

2026-02-23 immunology
10.64898/2026.02.21.707206 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Integrating antibody-based imaging with mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) on the same formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue section offers powerful opportunities for multimodal spatial analysis but remains analytically challenging due to cross-platform chemical and physical interference. In particular, chemically aggressive on-tissue derivatization strategies required for isomer-resolved glycan MSI may compromise downstream antibody detection. Here, we systematically evaluate the analytical compatibility and acquisition order of imaging mass cytometry (IMC) and sialic-acid-linkage-resolving N-glycan MALDI-MSI using an Amidation-Activation-X-Linkage (AAXL) derivatization strategy on the same FFPE tissue section. Two same-section workflows were compared: AAXL-MALDI MSI followed by IMC (MALDI-first) and IMC followed by AAXL-MALDI MSI (IMC-first). We find that AAXL-first processing results in severe and widespread loss of IMC anti-body signal across epithelial, immune, and nuclear markers, rendering subsequent antibody-based analysis unreliable. In contrast, IMC-first acquisition preserves quantitative antibody performance while maintaining spatial glycan distributions, relative abundance structure, and isomer-specific signal integrity in downstream AAXL-MALDI MSI. Using high-precision co-registration, we further demonstrate that IMC-first sequencing enables analytically robust integration of IMC and MSI data at both domain and pixel levels. These results establish IMC-first acquisition as the preferred same-section strategy for workflows combining antibody imaging with chemically intensive, isomer-resolved glycan MSI and provide generalizable guidance for the design of multimodal spatial mass spectrometry experiments.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.1%
2
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
3
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.8%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
6
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
9
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
13
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
15
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
16
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
19
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
21
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
22
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
26
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.6%