Back

Harmonizing Peak Matching Between Multidimensional NMR Spectra

Bishop, A. C.; Mimun, K.; Tan, W.; Cole, T. R.; Wand, A. J.

2026-02-23 biophysics
10.64898/2026.02.21.707192 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A common task in analysis of multidimensional NMR is the mapping of cross-peaks from one spectrum to another. In some situations, only a subset of coordinates of cross-peaks are to be matched such as in comparing corresponding dimensions of triple resonance assignment spectra. In other cases, the sample is perturbed in some way, and the task is to map corresponding cross-peaks that potentially change in any and all dimensions. This exercise is commonly done "by hand" and is both time-consuming and subjective. It is difficult for an individual to consider all possible interpretations of deviations between two multidimensional NMR spectra. Furthermore, in regions of high degeneracy, cross-peak matchings between spectra can be ambiguous. Ideally, a mapping algorithm should reflect a confidence of its matchings to indicate the reliability of proposed matchings and should do so while harmonizing all potential mappings in the spectrum. Critically, this process should be automated using criteria that are both well-defined, consistent and provide a measure of reliability. Here we develop a novel model describing the distribution of apparent deviations between cross-peaks of two multidimensional NMR spectra to random noise and true deviations to harmonize the cross-peak matching. Bayesian inference is employed to provide confidence estimates. The resulting algorithm (pHarmony) is tested in a variety of ways such as mapping between pairs of triple resonance spectra and between two- and three-dimensional heteronuclear NMR spectra generated by a fragment-based ligand discovery screen.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.4%
2
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.3%
5
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
6
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
8
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
9
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
10
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
12
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
15
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
23
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Journal of Computational Chemistry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%