Back

How Resource Heterogeneity and Social Threat Shape Intergroup Tolerance: Insights from a Spatial Agent-Based Model

Grueter, C. C.

2026-02-21 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.02.21.707157 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The emergence of tolerance between distinct social groups is a central question in social evolution, with relevance to both nonhuman primates and early human societies. Ecological factors such as resource heterogeneity and social threats like bachelor male presence have each been proposed as drivers of intergroup proximity, but their combined effects remain unclear. We developed a spatially explicit agent-based model to examine how resource patchiness and bachelor threat jointly shape aggregation dynamics and intergroup tolerance among mixed-sex groups. In the model, groups forage across heterogeneous landscapes and expand their ranges with increasing patchiness. Bachelor males roam independently and pose localized threats, prompting groups to aggregate probabilistically according to threat intensity. Aggregation decisions follow a sigmoid response, and familiarity accumulates through repeated overlap or joint aggregation. Intergroup tolerance thus arises from encounter histories rather than being preprogrammed. Simulations show that resource heterogeneity promotes tolerance by increasing overlap and encounter frequency, while bachelor threat induces aggregation as a protective response. Tolerance can also emerge without consistent aggregation, provided that ecological conditions repeatedly bring groups together. When both heterogeneity and threat are high, aggregation and familiarity peak, indicating a synergistic effect. These outcomes are robust across a wide parameter space and do not require explicit coordination or cooperative intent. Our findings highlight how simple behavioral rules embedded in ecological and social contexts can yield complex intergroup outcomes, offering a general framework for understanding the evolution of intergroup tolerance in primates and humans.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.2%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.3%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.3%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
7
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
8
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.1%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
10
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
12
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
17
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
21
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
23
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%