Back

A closed-loop mathematical structure of mechanics-turnover coupling for mechanical adaptation in living systems

Matsumoto, E.; Deguchi, S.

2026-02-21 biophysics
10.64898/2026.02.20.707125 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mechanical adaptation underlies mechanical homeostasis by allowing living systems to restore characteristic mechanical variables under sustained perturbations. Across biological scales, turnover-mediated remodeling enables mechanical adaptation by continuously renewing internal structures under load. Despite extensive progress in this field, it remains to be established what closed-loop mathematical structure of mechanics-turnover coupling is sufficient to guarantee homeostasis and how the characteristic adaptation timescale emerges from this coupling. Here, we identify the minimal mathematical structure of closed-loop mechanics-turnover coupling, providing a unifying description of mechanically adaptive remodeling across scales. We derive an analytical expression for the adaptation timescale as a function of the coupling between internal mechanical parameters and turnover kinetics, enabling direct cross-system comparison. To isolate this structure, we formulate a dynamical model linking mechanics and turnover, and establish conditions under which the closed-loop dynamics exhibit integral action. Specifically, our model describes how deviations in the mechanical state modulate the turnover of an internal structural state, and the renewed structure feeds back onto mechanics in a negative-feedback direction, driving recovery toward a reference state. We define systems satisfying this structure as Feedback Adaptive Turnover-mediated Environment-Dependent (FATED) systems. As an experimental example, we formulate mechanical adaptation in terms of mechanically regulated actin turnover. With the generalization of this architecture, we evaluate cross-system consistency by comparing reported adaptation and turnover timescales across representative remodeling systems.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 2%
17.8%
2
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
8.0%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.9%
5
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
7
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
9
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.5%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
13
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
14
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
18
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.2%
19
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
25
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%