Back

Partition Coefficients Reveal Changes in Properties of Low-Contrast Biomolecular Condensates

Varma, K.; Matthias, D.; Shapiro, C. B.; Bailey-Darland, S.; Matsuzawa, T.; Lorenz, C.; Bate, T.; Thornton, S. J.; Duraivel, S.; Style, R. W.; Sethna, J. P.; Dufresne, E. R.

2026-02-23 biophysics
10.64898/2026.02.20.707107 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biomolecular condensates are domains within cells with distinct compositions, held together by intermolecular cohesion. They are implicated in a variety of cellular processes, and in vitro studies have revealed the molecular driving forces that underly their condensation. However, in vitro condensates do not capture essential features of cellular condensates. In particular, enrichment of proteins, quantified by partition coefficients, is often exaggerated in these simplified systems. We show that the addition of free amino acids and other small molecules to model condensates can bring their partition coefficients within physiological range. In this limit, where there is low biochemical contrast between condensates and their surroundings, we observe striking changes to condensate behavior. Such low-contrast condensates exhibit large fluctuations in shape and composition and show enhanced sensitivity to changes in their environment. These behaviors reflect dramatic shifts to their material properties, including interfacial tension, rheology, and chemical susceptibilities. We note remarkable similarities in these effects across seemingly unrelated two-phase fluid systems. To explain these trends, we reformulate classic models of critical phenomena in terms of partition coefficients. This framework simplifies application of theory to experiments with near-critical fluids and suggests new experimental approaches for assessing condensate physiology in live cells.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
22.3%
2
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
3
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.0%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.9%
6
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
7
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
9
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
12
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
13
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
14
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
15
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
22
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.6%