Back

Experimental Quality Control Induces Changes in Allen Mouse Brain Connectomes

Nathan, V.; Tullo, S.; Herrera-Portillo, L.; Devenyi, G.; Yee, Y.; Chakravarty, M. M.

2026-03-03 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.20.707091 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Allen Mouse Brain Connectivity Atlas (AMBCA) is widely used to represent structural connectivity in the mouse brain. The AMBCA consists of tracer injection experiments where neuronal projections axonally connected to the initial injection site are labelled. The resulting whole-brain structural connectomes, derived from a subset of these experiments in C57BL/6 mice, have been used in several studies of connectomic architectures. However, through close inspection of n=437 distinct experiments used in a publicly-available connectome (Knox et al., 2018), we observed experiments with off-target injections, diffuse projections, unrealistically small injections and projections, and anatomical misalignments, affecting the accuracy and applicability of these connectivity experiments. We applied a combined automated and manual quality control (QC) and identified n=56 ([~]13% of the original n=437) experiments representing a wide variety of injection and projection failures across the brain. Automated QC was used to detect extreme injection and projection sizes and misalignments, while manual QC was used to detect subtle off-target tracer spreading. Using the remaining n=381 experiments, we rebuilt two different connectomes using previously-published methods; specifically: the regionalized voxel model from Knox et al. (2018), and the homogeneous model from Oh et al. (2014). Our rebuilt connectomes show strong losses in connectivity between regions with limited evidence of structural connectivity by other methods (e.g. hippocampus-medulla, cerebellum-isocortex) and gains in connectivity between regions with strong connectivity evidence (hypothalamus-cerebellum, hypothalamus-isocortex). Finally, we analyzed the rich club and community organization to demonstrate the potential downstream impacts on the representation of the overall structural connectome architectures of our QCd connectomes and observed subtle whole-brain organizational changes. We present our rebuilt connectomes, and particularly highlight the regionalized voxel model, as more accurate representations of structural connectivity derived from the AMBCA.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.7%
2
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
13.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.2%
4
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.8%
6
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
8
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
9
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
11
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
12
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.0%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
Brain Connectivity
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.5%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.5%
24
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%