Back

Harvest probabilities of European ducks: the very first estimation based on reward rings

Souchay, G.; Caizergues, A.; Bacon, L.; Champagnon, J.; Devineau, O.; Gelin, M.; Grzegorczyk, E.; Lebreton, J.-D.; Plaquin, B.; Pradel, R.; Guillemain, M.

2026-02-20 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.20.706967 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ringing-recoveries are an overarching element of population dynamic studies that allow estimating mortality causes and hence improve wildlife management. However, possible drawbacks of recovered rings reside in the fact that reporting probability is rarely known, but consistently lower than 100%. Thus, estimating harvest probabilities (mortality probability due to harvesting) of exploited species without knowledge of ring reporting probability by people exploiting these animals is not straightforward. We here provide the first ever reward-ring study carried out to evaluate European reporting probabilities, hence European harvest probabilities, in three species of ducks (Mallard Anas platyrhynchos, Eurasian Teal A. crecca and Common Pochard Aythya ferina). The 70 Euros reward on some rings was considered to yield a total return of the rings, allowing by comparison to evaluate the reporting probability of standard rings. After the initial year of ringing, annual reporting probability was very similar among the three species, at 0.63-0.66, suggesting two-thirds of the found rings are sent back to the ringing centre. This allowed computation of the annual harvest probability, which was up to 0.27 during the first months after ringing in fall but decreased to 0.04-0.10 during later years. Compared to North American results, the present estimates suggest birds are submitted to a heavy hunting mortality during the first months after ringing, but this pressure declines in later years, likely owing to counter selection of vulnerable/exposed individuals and/or learning by the birds.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.0%
4
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
7
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
8
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
20
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
29
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%