Back

Engaging Visual Media Shifts Taste-Related Neural Processing: An fMRI Study on Distracted Eating

Friedmann, R.; Grii, B.; Jacoby, E.; Digel, I.; Rodriguez-Raecke, R.; Sijben, R.

2026-02-23 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.20.706951 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDistracted eating is prevalent in modern environments. While behavioral research consistently shows that distraction attenuates taste perception and increases food intake, the underlying neural mechanisms appear to be more complex. ObjectiveThis functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study investigated whether naturalistic distraction modulates gustatory processing via sensory suppression or reallocation of neural resources, as observed in more controlled cognitive load paradigms. MethodsThirty-eight healthy participants received sweet and umami taste stimuli of low and high concentration during fMRI scanning. Attentional state was manipulated using short food-related (low-distraction) versus film-related (high-distraction) video clips. After each video, participants rated perceived intensity and pleasantness. Group-level analyses included covariates for sex, body mass index (BMI), and hunger level. ResultsHigh distraction attenuated perceived intensity (p < 0.001, d = -0.28) and pleasantness (p < 0.01, d = -0.21), independent of taste category or concentration. No significant attenuation by distraction was observed in core gustatory regions (insula, orbitofrontal cortex). Instead, distraction increased activation in occipital, thalamic, and cerebellar regions, indicating a redistribution of processing resources toward visual and attentional systems. ConclusionDistraction reduced taste salience without lowering gustatory cortex activity, supporting resource-competition models rather than active sensory suppression. These results reinforce that the impact of distracted eating is behaviorally robust yet neurally subtle, highlighting the need for personalized stimuli and ecologically valid methods to capture real-world eating behavior. The study demonstrates that video-based paradigms work reliably in fMRI and capture how naturalistic distraction alters taste experience.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
4
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
5
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
9
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
12
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
14
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
15
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
24
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%