Back

Low Dose Naltrexone Prescribing Practices for Children and Adolescents with Long COVID

Villatoro, C.; Yonts, A. B.; Barter, T.; Mohandas, S.; Malone, L. A.

2026-02-22 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.02.20.26346719 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPediatric long COVID is associated with substantial symptom burden, yet evidence-based pharmacologic treatments remain limited. Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) has been proposed as a potential symptomatic therapy, but data in pediatric populations is lacking. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of pediatric and young adult patients ([≤]25 years) with a clinical diagnosis of long COVID who were prescribed LDN between July 2020 and July 2025 at three multidisciplinary pediatric long COVID programs in the United States. Deidentified clinical data were extracted from medical records. Outcomes included symptom prevalence, dosing practices, treatment continuation or discontinuation, adverse effects, and available patient-reported quality-of-life measures (PedsQL and PROMIS(R)). FindingsThe study included 62 patients (mean age, 15.6 years [range, 8-23]; 53.2% male and 46.8% female). Fatigue was nearly universal (98.4%), followed by headaches (87.1%), brain fog (74.2%), dizziness/lightheadedness (67.7%), anxiety (66.1%), and post-exertional malaise (56.5%). LDN-treated patients demonstrated a higher prevalence of neurocognitive and autonomic symptoms, compared to general clinic cohorts. Most patients (71.0%) reported no adverse effects; the most common were vivid dreams (9.7%) and insomnia (9.7%). At follow-up, 66.1% of patients remained on LDN. Medication discontinuation was attributed to perceived lack of benefit (43.8%) or side effects (25.0%). Baseline quality-of-life measures at initiation showed marked impairment: PedsQL Physical Health (M=38.0, SD=20.9) and Multidimensional Fatigue (M=35.7, SD=15.8) scores were low. PROMIS scores indicated reduced physical functioning (M=36.8, SD=8.7) and cognitive functioning (M=40.8, SD=7.6), with elevated fatigue (M=68.0, SD=10.4) and pain interference (M=58.6, SD=8.2) relative to population norms. The study was not designed to assess efficacy. InterpretationLDN was primarily prescribed to patients with prominent fatigue, neurocognitive symptoms, and autonomic dysfunction, and was generally well tolerated. These findings provide descriptive evidence of real-world prescribing practices and support the need for clinical trials to systematically evaluate LDNs efficacy in pediatric long COVID.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.4%
2
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
3
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
7
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
9
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
11
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
12
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
19
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
20
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
International Immunopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%