Time, talk, and teamwork: Perceptions of personalised dementia care planning conversations in primary care
Griffiths, S.; Wyman, D.; Clark, M.; Rait, G.; Davies, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundDementia affects over 57 million people worldwide. UK and international policy position personalised, conversation-based care planning as central to post-diagnostic support. However, delivery in primary care is inconsistent, and many practitioners lack dementia-specific communication training. Existing evidence focuses on single roles or settings, leaving a gap in understanding how communication operates across the primary care workforce. AimsTo identify what helps and hinders effective communication for integrated dementia care planning and determine the support and training needs of the wider primary care workforce. MethodsO_LISemi-structured interviews - 11 people with dementia, 13 family carers, and 19 primary care practitioners from diverse roles, exploring experiences of care planning conversations C_LIO_LIReflexive thematic analysis C_LI ResultsThree themes were developed, progressing from micro-level communication practices (Theme 1: Beyond the tick-box), through triadic dynamics (Theme 2: Balancing voices in the conversation), to organisational influences (Theme 3: From silos to meaningful shared care planning). Time and Conversation as intervention cut across all themes, shaping trust and disclosure. Participants reported reliance on tick box approaches, inconsistent preparation, and uncertainty about care plan purpose and ownership. Non-clinical roles were commonly viewed as well placed to support meaningful conversations, but were often described as constrained by unclear remit and weak integration. ConclusionsA persistent gap remains between policy ambitions and everyday practice. Time-pressured, checklist-driven encounters and fragmented systems undermine shared decision-making. The expanded primary care workforce offers untapped potential to address these gaps, but this requires clearer roles, formal integration, and targeted investment in communicative skills.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods multi-site case study of a person-centred intervention for constant observation in hospitals with people living with dementia 97%
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 94%
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 96%
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 94%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Informal caregiving following stroke: a qualitative exploration of carer self-identification, care-related language and support experiences 95%
- Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study 94%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Carers using assistive technology in dementia care: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study 97%
- Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation 97%
- Needs of key stakeholders to make advance care plans and advance directives for people with dementia - A scoping review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 94%
- Public involvement to enhance care home research; collaboration on a minimum data set for care homes 93%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.