Back

The control of goal-directed actions by nutrient-specific appetites and rewards

Roy, D. J.; Burton, T. J.; Balleine, B. W.

2026-02-20 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.02.19.706921 bioRxiv
Show abstract

There is evidence that appetites for specific nutrients can guide foraging behaviour and aid in dietary regulation through associative learning processes that link stimuli to nutrient-specific outcomes. However, most, if not all, examples of such behaviour can be interpreted as being stimulus-bound habits, i.e., reflexive responses induced by environmental stimuli. The control of identified goal-directed actions by nutrient-specific appetites has not been directly assessed. To address this question, we trained rats to press a lever for a high protein reward (whey protein shake) and another lever for a high carbohydrate reward (polycose solution). They were then tested under extinction conditions in which both levers were available following the extended exposure to meals that were high in protein or carbohydrate. When otherwise food-deprived rats had been selectively satiated on protein immediately prior to test, they pressed more on the lever they learned had produced polycose, whereas they pressed the lever they learned had produced whey protein more if they had instead been satiated on carbohydrate. Crucially, the same pattern emerged whether the satiety manipulation was achieved using the same nutrient sources that rats had earned during training (i.e., whey or polycose) or with foods high in the relevant nutrients, indicating that these behaviours were under goal-directed control and sensitive to nutritional state. These results show that actions can be motivated by the nutritional relevance of the instrumental outcome to specific appetites, a relationship that may guide natural foraging decisions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
21.6%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.1%
3
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.5%
4
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.4%
8
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.4%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.5%
12
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
14
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
19
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
27
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%