Back

Differential analysis of image-based chromatin tracing data with Dory

Ma, Z.; Liu, M.; Wang, S.; Wang, S.; Zang, C.

2026-02-20 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.02.19.706897 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial organization of the genome plays a vital role in defining cell identity and regulating gene expression. The three-dimensional (3D) genome structure can be measured by sequencing-based techniques such as Hi-C usually on the cell population level or by imaging-based techniques such as chromatin tracing at the single-cell level. Chromatin tracing is a multiplexed DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based method that can directly map the 3D positions of genomic loci along individual chromosomes at single-molecule resolution. However, few computational tools are available for statistical differential analysis of chromatin tracing data, which are inherently high-dimensional, highly variable and contain many missing values. Here, we present Dory, a statistical method for identifying differential spatial patterns between two groups of chromatin traces. Dory quantifies pairwise spatial distances among genomic regions in a chromatin trace and applies multi-level statistical tests to detect significant structural differences between the two groups of traces. It produces a differential score matrix highlighting region pairs with significant distance difference. Applying Dory to multiple chromatin tracing datasets, we found that the detected chromatin structural changes were associated with alterations in A/B compartments and promoter-enhancer interactions correlated with differential gene expression. Dory is a robust and user-friendly computational tool for quantitative analysis of imaging-based 3D genome data that enables systematic exploration of chromatin architecture and its roles in gene regulation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.