Back

Bridging the gaps between field-based ecology and remote sensing to estimate plant functional diversity: a systematic review

Cerda-Paredes, J. M.; Pacheco-Labrador, J.; Craven, D.; Lopatin, J.

2026-02-19 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.19.706857 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding plant functional diversity across scales requires integrating field-based ecology and remote sensing, yet these disciplines differ in how traits are studied. We evaluated the conceptual and methodological convergence between these disciplines. Our results reveal that field-based ecology has undergone longer conceptual development and covers a broader range of traits, while remote sensing has experienced rapid growth driven by technological advances. Both disciplines are increasingly converging on similar concepts. However, major gaps in empirical coverage persist across biomes in both disciplines. Although plant-dominated ecosystems have been extensively studied, extreme ecosystems remain undersampled. While there is considerable diversity in the definition "functional traits", both disciplines converge on using a similar set of traits, reflecting their central role in plant strategies and spectral detectability. Our synthesis underscores the potential for methodological synergy. Harmonizing trait definitions, scaling assumptions, and computational steps involved in estimating plant functional diversity are crucial for building a unified, multiscale framework for biodiversity monitoring in ecosystems undergoing biodiversity loss and climate change. TeaserA synthesis of how field ecology and remote sensing can be aligned to monitor plant functional diversity across scales.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.1%
2
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.9%
3
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.0%
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.0%
5
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
9
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.1%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.0%
13
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
14
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
21
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
26
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
29
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%