Back

Sequence-dependent transferability of the LRLLR membrane translocation motif: A computational study of smacN and NR2B9c peptides.

Munoz-Gacitua, D.; Blamey, J.

2026-02-19 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.02.19.706823 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The LRLLR cell-penetrating motif can be transferred to confer membrane translocation activity, but only to compatible recipient peptides. Using umbrella sampling molecular dynamics simulations, we demonstrate that C-terminal LRLLR addition to the pro-apoptotic smacN peptide eliminates its translocation barrier entirely, transforming a +65 kJ/mol barrier into a -50 kJ/mol energy well. In contrast, N-terminal LRLLR addition to the neuroprotective NR2B9c peptide increases the translocation barrier from +85 to +100 kJ/mol, demonstrating that motif transfer can prove counterproductive for incompatible sequences. Cell-penetrating peptides offer promising strategies for intracellular delivery of therapeutic cargo, yet the sequence determinants governing their activity remain incompletely understood. The LRLLR motif, identified through systematic screening as essential for spontaneous membrane translocation, represents a minimal penetrating element whose transferability has not been previously evaluated. We appended this motif to two clinically relevant peptides: smacN, a tetrapeptide targeting inhibitor of apoptosis proteins in chemotherapy-resistant cancers, and NR2B9c, a nonapeptide that disrupts excitotoxic signaling in ischemic stroke. Potential of mean force profiles calculated across a POPC/POPG bilayer, combined with analysis of hydrogen bonding patterns, secondary structure propensity, and conformational dynamics, reveal the structural basis for these divergent outcomes. Successful transfer to smacN results from favorable complementarity: the hydrophobic, neutral smacN provides an ideal platform for the charged, amphipathic LRLLR motif, yielding a chimera capable of simultaneous interaction with both membrane leaflets. Transfer failure with NR2B9c stems from conformational rigidity induced by intramolecular hydrogen bonding, which prevents optimal membrane insertion, combined with unfavorable positioning of internal polar residues at the bilayer center. These findings establish that cell-penetrating motif transfer requires compatibility in charge distribution, hydrophobicity, and conformational flexibility between the motif and recipient sequence. The smacN-LRLLR chimera emerges as a promising candidate for experimental validation as a membrane-permeable therapeutic for survivin-positive tumors. More broadly, this work demonstrates the value of computational screening to identify compatible motif-cargo pairings prior to experimental investment.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.3%
3
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.0%
4
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.4%
6
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
10
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
11
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
13
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
16
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
18
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
19
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
22
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
24
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%