Back

What drives intersubject correlation of EEG during auditory narratives?

Flo, E.; Cabana, A.; Valle-Lisboa, J.; Cruse, D.; Madsen, J.; Parra, L. C.; Sitt, J. D.

2026-02-20 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.19.706583 bioRxiv
Show abstract

When participants are engaged with auditory narratives, physiological and neural signals exhibit temporal correlations between subjects. The intersubject correlation (ISC) increases when attention is directed to the stories, suggesting that shared neural and bodily dynamics arise from a similar processing of the narratives. Identifying the factors that drive these common responses is clinically relevant for interpreting EEG ISC exhibited in unresponsive patients. In this study, we investigated whether the ISC of the EEG elicited by auditory narratives is driven by low-level acoustic (envelope, spectrogram) and/or higher-level linguistic information (word onset, word surprisal) in two groups of healthy participants during passive, attentive and distracted listening. We use temporal response functions (TRFs) for acoustic, and linguistic features to assess the contribution of each feature to the ISC, measured using correlated component analysis (CorrCA). TRFs derived for acoustic features explained a larger fraction of variance in the EEG than linguistic features and were the main contributors to the ISC. The attention-related increase in ISC was driven by all features. Importantly, word surprisal had an effect on ISC only during active story engagement, with timing and scalp distribution consistent with language processing. Notably, the linear responses captured by TRFs only explained a small amount of the overall ISC, suggesting that ISC is largely driven by nonlinear responses to the narratives. We propose that the combined use of ISC and TRFs has the potential to provide meaningful markers of language processing in patients with disorders of consciousness, and we suggest practical recommendations for their implementation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
14.8%
2
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
3
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.9%
5
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
11
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
12
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
13
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
17
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
18
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
20
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
21
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
23
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
24
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
27
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.7%
30
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%