An information content principle explains regulatory patterns of gene expression across human tissues
Golomb, R.; Yoles, M.; Fishilevich, S.; Cohen, B.; Savariego Peled, S.; Dahary, D.; Gokhman, D.; Pilpel, Y.
Show abstract
Gene expression patterns range from broadly expressed housekeeping genes to highly tissue-specific ones. Notably, many genes exhibit intermediate specificity, characterized by elevated expression in some tissues while low or absent in others. Understanding how regulatory demands scale with tissue specificity offers a valuable opportunity to uncover fundamental principles of genome regulation. By analyzing cis-regulatory element (CRE) counts across human genes with varying tissue specificity, we observed a nonlinear pattern: genes with intermediate specificity harbor the highest CRE count, suggesting distinct regulatory strategies across the expression spectrum. Motivated by this observation, we used the Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle from information theory, together with a maximum parsimony approach from phylogenetics, to quantify regulatory demands across tissues. Our analysis revealed that MDL-based regulatory demand scales consistently with diverse regulatory features, including CRE count, transcription-factor and microRNA targeting, and gene structure. To test whether this scaling changes across the expression spectrum, we partitioned genes by expression breadth. Two patterns emerged: features scaling with MDL in selectively expressed genes tend to act as on/off switches, whereas those in ubiquitous genes serve as fine-tuning knobs. Evolutionary analysis revealed that these regulatory patterns vary with gene age, with alignment between MDL and CRE counts peaking in intermediate-aged genes. Collectively, these results establish MDL combined with maximum parsimony as a powerful framework linking regulatory architecture, expression specificity, and evolutionary age, offering novel insights into the organizational principles underlying genome regulation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative occupancy of myriad transcription factors from one DNase experiment enables efficient comparisons across conditions 96%
- A limited set of transcriptional programs define major cell types 95%
- Large-scale investigation of species-specific orphan genes in the human gut microbiome elucidates their evolutionary origins 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recruitment of Homodimeric Proneural Factors by Conserved CAT-CAT E-Boxes Drives Major Epigenetic Reconfiguration in Cortical Neurogenesis 97%
- A high-resolution map of functional miR-181 response elements in the thymus reveals the role of coding sequence targeting and an alternative seed match 96%
- Structural and evolutionary determinants of Argonaute function 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- CREaTor: zero-shot cis-regulatory pattern modeling with attention mechanisms 96%
- An interpretable bimodal neural network characterizes the sequence and preexisting chromatin predictors of induced TF binding 96%
- Enhancer regulatory networks globally connect non-coding breast cancer loci to cancer genes 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Normal and cancer tissues are accurately characterised by intergenic transcription at RNA polymerase 2 binding sites 97%
- Interpretable deep learning reveals the sequence rules of Hippo signaling 96%
- Gene regulatory network inference from CRISPR perturbations in primary CD4+ T cells elucidates the genomic basis of immune disease 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.