Back

Geoclimatic oscillations and ancient reciprocal adaptive introgression shape the evolutionary trajectories of threatened Coilia

Fu, Z.; Wang, H.; Feng, Y.; Hu, Y.; Sun, Z.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, W.; Liang, X.; Chen, Q.; Liu, S.; Bao, B.; Lu, J.

2026-02-20 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.19.706424 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Geoclimatic oscillations have repeatedly reshaped biodiversity, yet how ancient lineages persist and diversify through profound environmental upheavals remains a central question in evolutionary genomics. By integrating chromosome-level genome assemblies, population genomics, and transcriptomic data across the Coilia species complex, we reconstruct deep evolutionary histories of Coilia along the dynamic East Asian margins. Our analyses reveal divergences dating to the Miocene, coinciding with major tectonic and climatic transitions, including Tibetan Plateau uplift-linked reorganization of the Yangtze drainage toward the East China Sea, and the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum. Despite long-term separation, we uncover evidence for ancient, reciprocal introgression among Coilia lineages, with gene flow confined to discrete genomic regions rather than distributed genome-wide. These introgressed regions are enriched for loci associated with immune function, vascular development, and osmoregulatory processes, and exhibit population genetic signatures consistent with positive selection. Temporal modelling indicates that this window of adaptive exchange preceded Pleistocene glacial intensification, after which gene flow became effectively restricted. Together, our results suggest that transiently permeable species boundaries historically acted as reservoirs of adaptive variation, shaping evolutionary trajectories and facilitating niche differentiation under repeated geoclimatic oscillations. This study highlights ancient adaptive introgression as an important evolutionary process contributing to the long-term persistence of threatened coastal fishes.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.