Back

Multiomic profiling of human and canine soft-tissue sarcomas reveals extensive molecular homology across species and identifies clinically relevant subgroups

Fuchs, D.; Jarosch, A.; Beebe, E.; Poeschel, A.; Sarver, A. L.; Kauzlaric, A.; Ruiz Buendia, G.; Roh, V.; Fournier, N.; Weber, M.; Opitz, L.; Kunz, L.; Wolski, W.; Guscetti, F.; Floercken, A.; Nolff, M. C.; Markkanen, E.

2026-02-19 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.02.19.701015 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) are rare and heterogeneous mesenchymal tumours with over 100 recognized human subtypes. Despite advances in cytogenetic and molecular characterization, diagnostic precision and therapeutic options remain limited for most subtypes. Spontaneously occurring canine STS could represent valuable translational models, due to their higher incidence and clinical similarity to human counterparts. However, molecular cross-species comparisons of specific subtypes are largely missing. Here, we performed a tissue-resolved, cross-species analysis of tumour and matched adjacent normal tissue (NT) in human and canine fibrosarcoma (FSA) and myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) by laser-capture microdissection of FFPE specimens combined with RNAseq and LC-MS/MS. Multimodal profiling revealed FSA and MFS to represent a molecular continuum rather than distinct entities in both species, resulted in identification of clinically relevant subgroups based on immune activation, proliferative activity and copy number alterations, and identified a novel canine STS subtype associated with a gene fusion. Moreover, our analyses revealed cross-species conserved transcriptomic and proteomic alterations distinguishing tumour from NT, including pathways linked to extracellular matrix remodelling, immune modulation, and cell proliferation. These data establish the first comprehensive molecular comparison of canine and human FSA and MFS, highlight the translational relevance of canine models, and identify candidate biomarkers for diagnostic refinement and development of targeted therapeutic modalities.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.1%
2
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.1%
4
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
5
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
6
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
8
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
9
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
12
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
14
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
20
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
21
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
23
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
24
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
25
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
26
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
27
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
28
Acta Neuropathologica
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.9%
30
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%