Back

The Effect of Occupational Integration on Musculoskeletal Injury in Female Marines in the Fleet: An Epidemiological Cohort Study

Fraser, J. J.; Zouris, J. M.; Hoch, J. M.; Sessoms, P. H.; MacGregor, A. J.; Hoch, M. C.

2026-02-23 occupational and environmental health
10.64898/2026.02.19.26346637 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionMusculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) are ubiquitous in the U.S. military, especially among high-performing service members such as Marines. Given that female service members only started to be assigned to ground combat roles since December 2015, evaluation of sex on MSKI risk in ground combat occupations has not been possible until there was an ample population to study. The purpose of this population-level epidemiological study was to assess (1) if female sex was a salient risk factor for MSKI in Marines serving in different military occupations, including combat arms, and (2) the effects of integration period on MSKI risk among female Marines. Materials and MethodsA population-based epidemiological retrospective cohort study of all U.S. Marines was performed assessing female sex, occupation, and integration period on the prevalence of MSKI from 2011 through 2020. The Military Health System Data Repository was utilized to identify initial healthcare encounters for diagnosed ankle-foot, knee, lumbopelvic-hip, thoracocostal, cervicothoracic, shoulder, elbow, or wrist-hand complex injuries. Prevalence was calculated for female and male Marines in each occupational category (combat, combat support, aviators, aviation support, services) during the pre-integration (2011-2015) and post-integration (2016-2020) periods. ResultsDuring the pre-integration period, 520/1,000 female Marines (n=13,985) and 299/1,000 male Marines (n=142,158) incurred MSKIs. In the post-integration period, the prevalence increased to 565/1,000 female Marines (n=17,608) and 348/1,000 male Marines (n=161,429). In the multivariable evaluation of sex, occupation, integration period, and the interaction of sex and occupation on combined MSKIs, only female sex was a significant factor for injury (prevalence ratio [PR]=1.99), with service in ground combat and aviation occupations identified as protective factors when compared with services occupations (PR=0.69). When these same factors were evaluated for specific MSKI outcomes, female sex remained a robust factor in all lower quarter (PR=1.75-2.63) and upper quarter (PR=1.38-2.36) injuries except for shoulder injuries. Service in ground combat and aviation occupations was protective for all lower quarter injuries (PR=0.46-0.71). In the upper quarter, ground combat was protective for all injuries except for elbow injuries (PR=0.67-0.77). Serving as an aviator was a risk factor for cervicothoracic (PR=1.57) and thoracocostal (PR=1.22) injuries and a protective factor for shoulder (PR = 0.73) and wrist-hand (PR = 0.46) injuries. Adjusted risk for lumbopelvic-hip (PR=1.13), ankle-foot (PR=1.53), cervicothoracic (PR=1.19), thoracocostal (PR=1.14), and elbow (PR=1.48) injuries significantly increased during the post-integration period. There was a significant sex-by-period interaction for shoulder injuries alone, with female sex in the post-integration epoch found to be salient (PR=1.26). ConclusionsFemale sex was a salient factor for MSKI, with service in ground combat and aviation occupations identified as protective factors when compared with services occupations. In the evaluation of specific MSKIs, female sex remained a robust and significant factor in all lower quarter injuries and upper quarter injuries except for shoulder injuries. There was only a significant sex-by-period interaction for shoulder conditions, with an increased risk of these injuries in female Marines in the post-integration period.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
6
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
7
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
8
Journal of Occupational Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
10
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
11
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
13
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
14
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
15
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
18
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
19
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
21
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%