Back

Neonatal and Early Childhood Epigenetic Variation Linked to Social and Behavioral Outcomes in Very Preterm Children

Patel, P.; Huang, Y.; Camerota, M.; Cragin, C.; Carter, B.; Check, J.; Helderman, J.; Hofheimer, J.; McGowan, E.; Neal, C.; O'Shea, M.; Pastyrnak, S.; Smith, L.; Marsit, C.; Lester, B. M.; Everson, T.

2026-02-20 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.02.19.26346629 medRxiv
Show abstract

Very preterm infants (<30 weeks gestation) are at elevated risk for neurodevelopmental and social-behavioral challenges. DNA methylation (DNAm) may provide a biological link between preterm birth and later behavioral outcomes. We examined associations between DNAm profiles at neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge and at age 5 with Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) scores which measure social communication, social interaction, and repetitive behaviors at age 5, including sex-specific effects, in the Neonatal Neurobehavior and Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants (NOVI) Study. Epigenome-wide buccal DNAm was profiled at NICU discharge (n=218) and at 5 years (n=188). We identified 38 neonatal and 6 age-5 CpG sites associated with SRS scores (all q<0.05) using epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) at each time point. Several CpGs mapped to genes involved in neurodevelopment including TCF4, KLC4, CAP2, PTDSS1, ADAM12, SENP1, CHN2, SH3D19, and ITGA1, with sex-specific effects observed for CpGs in CAMTA1 and GABBR1. Enriched pathways included neurodevelopment, cytoskeletal regulation, stress-response, and metabolic processes. DNAm patterns during early life, particularly the neonatal period, were associated with social-behavioral development in very preterm children. Findings in key genes such as TCF4 and CAMTA1 highlight potential epigenetic mechanisms linking early-life biology to later behavioral challenges.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.