Back

SATB2/elastic lamina dual-staining in colon cancer: clinicopathological impact and prognostic value

Jiang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Sheng, H.; Wang, Q.; Hu, B.; Wang, L.; Fu, J.

2026-02-22 pathology
10.64898/2026.02.19.26346607 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo explore the application value of dual-staining for specific AT sequence binding protein 2 (SATB2) immunohistochemistry and elastic lamina in detecting elastic lamina invasion (ELI) in pT3 colon cancer, and to assess its association with clinicopathological characteristics, staging, and prognosis. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study enrolled 176 pT3 colon cancer patients who underwent radical resection at Affiliated Jinhua Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The deepest tumor-infiltrated paraffin blocks were collected for SATB2 immunohistochemistry and elastin dual-staining. Correlations between ELI status and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were analyzed. Survival data of 74 pT4a stage patients were collected for comparative analysis. ResultsELI (+) was positively associated with high tumor budding grade, vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and reduced tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (all P < 0.001). No correlations were observed with age, gender, tumor location, histological subtype, tumor grade, or perineural invasion (all P > 0.05). The ELI (+) group exhibited significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to ELI (-) group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the ELI (+) group demonstrated inferior OS than the pT4a group, though DFS did not differ significantly. ConclusionDual-staining of SATB2 immunohistochemistry and elastic lamina provides a reproducible and objective method for assessing ELI. ELI correlates with key clinicopathological features and functions as an independent adverse prognostic indicator in pT3 colon cancer.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.